Sentence examples for binding energy compared to from inspiring English sources

The variation in Au 4f7/2 binding energy compared to that of bulk Au (84.0 eV) confirmed the strong electronic interaction between the AuNPs and ZnO [43, 44].

Meanwhile, the Zn 2p peak of the 20-nm-thick ZnO Cs2CO3 film keeps higher binding energy compared to that of the 20-nm-thick ITO/ZnO film.

BPP_1 has the highest binding energy compared to the other BPP derivatives to the copper surface that are found during the molecular dynamics simulation process described elsewhere [83].

However, in the XPS spectra, Nb3d peaks are shifted to lower binding energy compared to the unused LiNb3O8, indicating that partially, Nb5+ has been reduced and photoreduction of LiNb3O8 occurred on the surface during the photo-degradation process [15, 27 29].

The additional electrons on the charged species screen their N 1s levels and move them to 3 eV lower binding energy compared to the core levels of the neutral molecules.

In this study, 35 drug-like hit compounds were selected from the designed 55 tyrosine derivatives based on their better binding affinity (–C-Docker energy) compared to the standard celecoxib (Table 4).

For the g-C3N4/PtNi/GO-0.5 g-C3N4/PtNi/GO-0.5 g-C3N4/PtNi/GO-0.5 of Pt 4f shift about 0.42 eV to high binding energy compared with pure Pt.

The peak of O1s from rGO (531.3 eV) shifted to lower binding energy compared with that of GO (531.8 eV), implying that there existed a chemical interaction between rGO and Ag3PO4 QDs by C=O bond.

The Ag 3d5/2 and 3d3/2 peaks of Ag/rGO nanocomposites 1C appeared at 368 and 374 eV, respectively, which shifted to the lower binding energy compared with the characteristic peaks for silver metal at 368.2 and 374.2 eV.

The binding energies of Ag 3d 5/2 and Ag 3d 3/2 for the Ag/ZnO nanocables are 367.7 and 373.7 eV, respectively, which shift remarkably to the lower binding energy compared with the corresponding values of the synthesized pure metallic Ag (the standard binding energies of Ag 3d 5/2 and Ag 3d 3/2 for bulk Ag are about 368.2 and 374.2 eV, respectively).

Furthermore, the binding energies of Ag 3d for Ag-ZnO shift to the lower binding energy compared with bare Ag metal NPs (368.2 and 374.2 eV for Ag 3d5/2 and Ag 3d3/2, respectively) should be caused by the interaction between ZnO NRs and Ag NPs. Figure 5 XPS spectra of samples.