Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The first assumption (weak interactions) can be easy to justify over the course of a reaction: if no new substrate is created, and if the binding constant has a much higher value than the initial substrate levels, then the binding constant will always be much greater than the substrate levels.
Similar(59)
The apparent binding constant has been obtained.
The values of binding constant have been determined to be 4.1 × 105 M−1 and 4.8 × 105 M−1; and 5.2 × 105 M−1 and 5.6 × 105 M−1 for ETO and ETO cation free radical in phosphate buffer solutions of pH 4.5 and 7.4; respectively.
Binding stoichiometry and binding constants have been investigated to determine the ratio and relative stability of Fe3+ complexes.
Fluorescent enhancement has been explained on the basis of photo-induced electron transfer (PET) mechanism and apparent binding constants have been deduced.
The binding constants have been estimated to be K ~ 10 M−1 for all the temperatures used.
A couple of recent studies that have attempted to determine SRP-RNC binding constants have certainly generated some controversy and perhaps illustrate the pitfalls of using static RNCs, but I wouldn't call this a "paradox".
The secondary binding then has a microscopic binding constant of 0.43 pM1/4 ∼ 0.8 mM.
Subcortical white matter can be used as a reference region for quantitative analysis of [F]FDDNP with the Logan method which allows more accurate and less biased binding estimates, but a population efflux rate constant has to be determined a priori.
The equilibrium binding constant (KD), which has an inverse relationship to the affinity of various peptides to the Aβ40 fibrils, was the highest for rodent Aβ40 R5G, Y10F, H13R followed by Aβ40H13R, Aβ40, Aβ40H13G, and Aβ40 H14G 14G.
The apparent binding constants (Kapp) has been obtained 3.9 and 10.9 × 104 M−1 at lower concentration range and 1.03 and 1.59 × 104 M−1 at higher concentration range for complexes (1) and (2), respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com