Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(2)
Dynamic shear moduli and tensile strengths of the asphalt binders were measured using a dynamic a shear rheometer (DSR) and a tension compression machine, respectively.
The physical properties of the blended binders were measured using the rotational viscometer (RV), dynamic shear rheometer (DSR), multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR), and bending beam rheometer (BBR) tests.
Similar(58)
The contact angle of selected asphalt binders was measured using both WP and SD techniques.
Further, low temperature cracking potential of RAPs blended binders was measured using bending beam rheometer (BBR) test.
The contact angle of asphalt binders was measured using sessile drop method, and SFE of each of the selected asphalt binders was determined for all ten combinations of probe liquids.
The SFE components of nanoclay modified binder were measured using Wilhelmy plate method.
A direct physical interaction between the AF2 binders and the ERα protein was measured using biolayer interferometry (BLI) and an ERα coactivator displacement assay.
First contact angle of Control binder with WMA additives with and without HL was measured using Wilhelmy plate.
Many studies have been conducted evaluating the aging effects on asphalt binders since their properties can be easily measured using many conventional tests, such as rotational viscometer, DSR (dynamic shear rheometer), and BBR (bending beam rheometer).
The SFE components (non-polar, acid and base) of a PG 64-22 and a PG 76-28 (polymer-modified) asphalt binders, blended with different amounts of RAP binder (0%, 10%, 25 % and 40) were measured in the laboratory using a Dynamic Contact Angle (DCA) analyzer.
Attaching to cantilever ends with microspheres of alumina, silica and calcium carbonate, the adhesion between aggregate minerals and binder substrates at ambient conditions was measured directly using atomic force microscopes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com