Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(16)
This paper presents the effect of nano-silica on the hydration and microstructure development of Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC) with a low binder amount.
The design and characterization of SCC influences not only the mix components (paste volume and nature, binder amount and type, granular skeleton, etc).
The results show that by utilizing the improved packing model, it is possible to design UHPFRC with a relatively low binder amount.
To this end, it was proved that the mechanical performance of mortars is controlled by the combination of both binder amount and packing density of the aggregates.
The results show that by utilizing the improved packing model, it is possible to design a type of UHPHFRC with a relatively low binder amount, which can make the concrete more "green".
The results reveal that by utilizing this packing model, a dense and homogeneous skeleton of UHPC can be obtained with a relatively low binder amount (about 440 kg/m3).
Similar(44)
In particular, after immersion for 84 days, the mass reduction rate of specimens of porous concrete using cementless binder amounted to 68.53 %, which value is relatively higher than those of specimens of porous concrete using OPC, which had values of 65.46 %.
However, at the age of 28 days, the crystalloids of porous concrete using cementless binders amounted to 62%%, thus increasing by approximately 10%% in comparison with the early stage, and differed quantitatively from those of porous concrete using OPC by approximately 8%%, thus exhibiting outstanding crystalloid generation.
This minimum liquid volume is determined as a function of dry binder type, amount, hygroscopicity and particle size distribution of diluent.
Therefore, if red mud is mixed instead of a binder, the amount of cement needed for hydration reaction decreases in OPC, which leads to a reduction in porosity.
Independent variables, such as the type of the alkali activator and binder, the amount of paste, and CO2 concentration, were considered.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com