Sentence examples for binary ratings from inspiring English sources

None of the questions that were previously rated as properly specified had their binary ratings changed.

In [14] and [15], item-based and user-based incremental algorithms that use implicit binary ratings are proposed and evaluated.

We observe that, while we may lack the information in numerical ratings, we sometimes have additional auxiliary data in the form of binary ratings.

Similarity between a pair of users (or items) is calculated using a simplified version of the cosine measure for binary ratings [14, 15].

In this paper, we present and evaluate the impact of two forgetting mechanisms sliding windows and fading factors in user-based and item-based CF algorithms with implicit binary ratings under a scenario of abrupt change.

Collaborative recommendation with heterogeneous explicit feedbacks (CR-HEF) such as 5-star grade scores and like/dislike binary ratings is a new and important problem, because it provides a rich and accurate source for learning users' preferences.

Taken together, these results show a general response pattern across subjects to attribute a binary rating strategy suggesting that novelty/abnormality influence aesthetic ratings [16], [17].

Standardized inter-rater reliability for independent video raters was.79 for the assessment of step 4 of Peyton's four-step approach, and.75 for the evaluation of the final, sixth repetition when using binary checklist ratings, and.76 for the assessment of step 4 of Peyton's four-step approach, and.81 for the evaluation of the final, sixth repetition when using global performance ratings.

For expert binary checklist ratings, an ANOVA with the between-subject factor 'Group' (HFF vs. LFF) and within-subject factors 'Time' (T1 vs. T2) was conducted.

Regarding the exploratory analyses of task specific performance (as reflected by our binary checklist ratings), both groups benefited from the training but with no significant difference between the two groups.

At T2, both groups scored higher on binary checklist ratings compared to T1 (p < .001) with the HFF group showing higher scores at T2, although not significantly (p < .093; see Table  4).> -wrap-foot> LSD-post-hoc Tests.