Moreover, patients with atypical patterns (i.e., right hemisphere dominant or bilateral representation) were successfully identified (82%).
As a result, concrete words should have a more bilateral representation [ 1, 6].
In contrast, at the level of the whole hemisphere, the majority of participants (80%) showed bilateral representation of language, and the remaining individuals demonstrated left-hemispheric advantage.
Of the 22 components showing a relationship with language, 7 were left lateralized, 7 right lateralized and 8 had either bilateral representation or were midline structure.
It roughly overlaps with a 10°-wide zone of bilateral representation of the central visual field in the 2 hemispheres (White et al. 1999; Nakamura et al. 2008).
Similarly, when language lateralization was measured in the insular cortex, most of the subjects (73%) exhibited bilateral representation of this function.
When SMG was treated as one ROI, without differentiating between its anterior and posterior divisions, nearly half of the participants (47%) showed bilateral representation of gesture planning in SMG.
Patients with a laterality index of less than −0.4 or more than 0.4 were described as left and right dominant, respectively, while those patients with laterality indices between −0.4 and 0.4 were described as having bilateral representation of language (Briellmann et al., 2003).
43 In humans, attentional priority maps may correspond to bilateral representation of space in the symmetrical dorsal attentional network; 36 but spatiotemporal integration needed for an efficient and organized visual search over the entire space (SWM across saccades and/or remapping processes) might rely on a specialized right-hemispheric inferior parietal network.
Moreover, a frequently perceived advantage of this bilateral agency is its representation at national and district level.
