Normally, the results are prone to over-generalizations and biased theory-building.
One influential theory of visual selective attention, Desimone and Duncan's [1] biased competition theory, holds that the limited capacity of the visual system is a necessary consequence of the architecture of the object-selective regions of the extrastriate visual cortex.
Candidate functions are category formation [12], global executive control [19] [21], selective attention using a variant of biased competition theory [102], [103], habit formation [104] and memory reconsolidation [105].
According to the biased competition theory, when multiple items are present in the visual field, they must compete for representation in the visual system [1] and this competition increases as the stimuli get closer together [18] [21].
Mr. Kelly did not cite any specific reason for the bias theory.
The other broad explanation, social-bias theory, is that the difference is illusory.
The present observational, community-based, case-controlled study examined the 'healthy-user' bias theory by comparing cognitive task performance in two groups of postmenopausal women, who were either HT users or non-users.
This began to poke holes in my Clinton bias theory. .
Therefore, the main questions we address in this work are: (1) whether there are specific energetically equivalent binding energy "codon" or amino acid positions associated with TR binding angles as suggested by Garcia et al., [4] and; (2) if the "germline bias" theory really holds good across a large dataset.
MSEP similarity calculation at the pMHC interface together with TR paratope and pMHC epitope analyses have thus given us enough evidence to suggest a weakening of "germline bias" theory over a larger dataset and highlight the significant role played by the peptide in determining TR specificity, thereby, answering our second question (see Introduction section for details).
This implies that TR specificity is perhaps primarily peptide dependent rather than completely allele dependent, shedding light on the impact of peptide properties in this significant immunological synapse, thus, further enforcing our earlier conclusion and weakening the "TR-MHC germline bias" theory.
