Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
Predictive capabilities of the 15% trend alarm regarding the bias were evaluated using Spearman correlation, chi-square test, ROC analysis and Wilcoxon test (IBM SPSS 20).
To determine if misclassification differed statistically significantly across characteristics such as gender, education etc., significant differences in the mean misclassification bias were evaluated using a t-test, or one-way ANOVA where appropriate, for the SLÁN 2007 data.
Similar(58)
The methodological quality (risk of bias) was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool that addresses the domains of randomisation adequacy, blinding, allocation concealment, whether the intention-to-treat analysis was utilised, and attrition rate.
The upwind bias is evaluated using an estimate of the largest eigenvalue, which in any case is needed for selecting a time step.
Risk of bias was evaluated using the PEDro scale, and overall quality of evidence was assessed using the Grades of Research, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
Risk of bias was evaluated using a tool based on recommendations from the CAMARADES group [1].
Publication bias was evaluated using a funnel plot of a trial's effect size against the standard error.
Publication bias was evaluated using Stata V.12.0.
Publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test.
Risk of bias was evaluated using the PEDro scale.
Publication bias was evaluated using the funnel plot.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com