Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
> -wrap-foot> Bias mean deviation between both methods in percent, SD standard deviation of percent deviations for each single sample aNo Bland-Altman plot since only few positive samples were available The analyses were run in different laboratories by different personnel at different times revealing the ruggedness of the instrumentation and both methods.
Similar(59)
Bland-Altman plot with bias (mean difference between the device and YSI measurements) and limits of agreement (bias ± 1.96 x standard deviation of the bias) were used to show agreement between the device and YSI measurements [13].
A Bland-Altman plot with bias (mean difference between the device and BGA measurements) and limits of agreement (bias ± 1.96 x standard deviation of the bias) was used to analyse the agreement between the device and the BGA results.
Bland-Altman plot with bias (mean difference between the device and YSI measurements) and limits of agreement (bias ± 1.96 x standard deviation of the bias) were used to show agreement between the device and YSI measurements [ 13].
(b) Mean deviation between measured and estimated.
The mean deviation between the correlated and the tested point found to be 2.94%.
Calculating the mean deviation between imputed values and duplicate controls in five datasets, we show that KNN-based imputation gives a systematic bias of the imputed expression values of one-channel depleted spots.
The mean deviation between the predicted and measured values was -2 μg/m3 with a standard deviation of 3.6.
The mean bias (average difference between catheter readings and CO-oximeter values), precision (standard deviation of the bias) and limits of agreement (bias ± 2 SD of bias) were -0.17, 4.7 and -0.17 ± 9.4 respectively.
Calculation of the mean bias deviation between the predicted and experimental data indicates agreement better than 0.45 °C for the dry bulb temperature and 1.1 °C for the mean radiant temperature.
The bias was calculated as the mean deviation of estimates from 0 per replication, and the MSE was the mean of the square of the bias.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com