Sentence examples for bias interpreting from inspiring English sources

In observing customer behavior there is always the risk of what psychologists call "selection bias": interpreting data in ways that conform to what we've already determined to believe.

Equivocal results have emerged from an extensive literature examining a range of cognitive processes in the affective disorders, including judgment biases (interpreting ambiguous information in a positive or negative direction) and attention and memory biases (showing preferential attention or recall of positive or negatively valenced material).

In a review of the literature on bias in interpreting research results, the social psychologist Robert MacCoun (then at Berkeley and now at Stanford) found that "biased research interpretation is a common phenomenon, and an overdetermined one".

We assessed whether authors of observational epidemiologic studies consider confounding bias when interpreting the findings.

(ii) When pronouns occur, there is a bias to interpreting such elements as referring back to subjects of preceding sentences, rather than non-subjects.    .

The authors explained that, due to the potential for researcher bias when interpreting data, it has been recognized that credible results are difficult to achieve.

But what's more interesting is how Broockman and Kalla's method harnessed the problematic dynamics of confirmation bias (people interpreting new evidence to confirm the beliefs they already hold) and the "Backfire Effect" (when people confronted with conflicting facts actually "dig in" further to their pre-existing prejudices). .

But what's more interesting is how Broockman and Kalla's method harnessed the problematic dynamics of confirmation bias (people interpreting new evidence to confirm the beliefs they already hold) and the "Backfire Effect" (when people confronted with conflicting facts actually "dig in" further to their preexisting prejudices).

Pathological fear and anxiety and its physiological expression can be conceptualized as representing a continuum, ranging from persistent anxiety not attributable to specific factors to exaggerated responses to a perceived threat or a bias towards interpreting ambiguous situations as threatening [1].

However, we have to take into account this potential bias in interpreting the results.

The open-label study design used here is known to be associated with potential bias when interpreting study results.