Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(2)
Quantitative cases (cases where both sexes were present, but there was a significant bias in the numbers of one sex) were also analyzed for statistical significance using a binomial distribution test.
(We used asymmetric definitions here to overcome the 1 3 bias in the numbers of sequence- and structure-based domains in the data, respectively).
Similar(58)
These methods do not distinguish between biases in the numbers of individuals of each sex dispersing vs. the distances dispersed.
Alternatively, it may reflect biases in the numbers of horses which are attributed to Wales in the NED.
Therefore, the dorsoventral topography is largely a result of quantitative biases in the numbers of 'conspecific' and 'predator' neurons located dorsal vs ventral, while only 3% of the variance is explained by a smooth transition from 'predator' selective neurons (ventral) to 'conspecific' selective neurons (dorsal).
In addition, we explain that the misspecification of the probability model can lead to a bias in the number of change points and using a simple example, show that this problem is difficult to avoid by technical data transformation.
Figure 12 Description of the bias in the number of tweets and users, per country.
Previous studies have described significant bias in the number of reads generated from regions with differing GC-content [14].
No significant bias in the number of up or down regulated genes was observed among the 79 and 52 genes that reproducibly changed in three lines at the S0∶1 and S5∶6 generations, respectively.
Although we found no bias in the number of dives for or against sites with sharks (Fig 2), if there was a spatial sampling bias it should be towards sites with sharks and other abundant large fish because of their appeal to recreational divers [18], [32], [48].
If a given STEP-intron case had evidence of the spliced form as well as a bias in the number of STEP alleles relative to population allele frequency in the intron sequence it was shortlisted as a putative STEP (Table 3).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com