Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(4)
In addition, we provide evidence concerning hypothetical versus actual behavior with induced values – the data suggesting a hypothetical bias in the level of bids but not in bid shaving.
First, there may be evidence that there is an asymmetrical bias in the level of goal/action identification adopted in a psychological disorder relative to controls.
The difference between mean of the de-regressed EBV and mean of the GEBV gives an indication of the bias in the level of the GEBV.
In all scenarios, the bias in the level of predictions with models BLUP-SSVS and BLUP-C was similar to the bias observed with the Bayesian models and RR-BLUP in the FULL scenario.> -wrap-foot> All differences are expressed in standard deviations of the de-regressed EBV in the reference population.
Similar(56)
Previous ChIP-seq studies have revealed biases in the level of some genomic regions in input DNA, the most common control sample for ChIP experiments [ 22- 24].
In fact, when SNP variances were estimated with a subset of the data (RAN50, TOP50 and BOT50), both BLUP-SSVS and BLUP-C, which used all training data, were in most cases able to reduce the bias observed in the level of the GEBV (Table 4) and overcome the bias observed in the scale of the GEBV with the Bayesian models (Table 5).
This was intended to create a conservative bias in estimating the level of agreement with restrictions.
P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant except for the test of publication bias, in which the level of significance is P < 0.10 (14).
Two-sided P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant except for the test of publication bias, in which the level of significance was P < 0.10 (18).
The total number of X and/or Y bearing sperm from wild type and Dnmt3L heterozygous males (analysed separately) was the same, suggesting that the FISH probes worked equally well and that the loss of a Dnmt3L allele did not result in a sex chromosome bias at the level of the sperm (data not shown).
Heterogeneity of intervention effect estimates between single centre and multicentre trials has been poorly explored 50 and is not taken into account when assessing the risk of bias or the level of evidence in trials.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com