Sentence examples for bias does not change from inspiring English sources

Unlike configuration 1, changing the applied bias does not change the exciton photocurrent peak position (508 nm) for configurations 2 and 3.

It is also found that the body bias does not change the drive current but after body current gets affected.

Including the studies with possible high risk of bias does not change the pooled 'global' incidence estimate, but the credible interval decreases slightly: 0.24 [0.24; 0.24].

It has been previously reported that biased gene loss is consistent across entire ancestral chromosomes in maize and entire parental genomes in A. suecica (Chang et al. 2010; Schnable, Springer, et al. 2011) providing evidence that fractionation bias does not change across a chromosome.

The bias does not change with sample size; we did the same simulations with 2000 datasets, and the results were very similar to those shown in table 2. We have shown that the two myths described in the introduction are indeed myths: equal dropout rates can still yield biased estimates of treatment effects, and studies with unequal dropout rates can be analysed to produce unbiased results.

Results showed that the modified interpretive bias did not change in reaction to a mood change.

A sensitivity analysis accounting for the selection bias did not change the essence of the results, yet provided slightly lower values of the effects for injury and severe accidents, i.e. a 32%% reduction in injury accidents instead of 34%%, and a reduction trend in severe accidents with a mean value of 17%% instead of 22%%.

Because response bias did not change over time (Fig. 4B), the vigilance decrement observed was likely to be mediated by cognitive as opposed to motivational factors [40] [42].

Moreover, procedures to address a possible attrition bias did not change our results appreciably.

Further several procedures to account for possible non-response bias did not change our findings.

For both estimates, the relative bias did not change regardless of the size of the effect considered (Figs.  4, 5).