Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
However, as Tugendhat argues, it is genuinely hard to see how original truth as unconcealing could possibly support a distinction between what is asserted or intended and how things are in themselves.
As Tugendhat (1967) observes, it is a plausible condition on the acceptability of any proposed account of truth that it accommodate a distinction between what is asserted or intended and how things are in themselves.
Similar(58)
Both MacFarlane (2011) and García-Carpintero (2013) argue that we should distinguish between what is said and what is asserted, and that this allows us to maintain that an indirect assertion that swans are black are made by means of directly saying that the speaker commits himself.
What is asserted is simply an open sentence!
Hence, the line of thinking concludes, what is asserted, when one asserts (1), is assertoric content and not ingredient sense.
A sentence is possible only if what is asserted is not always non-actual (I.124-125).
What is asserted is just that both events did take place.
Abelard calls statements propositions (propositio) and what is asserted by a statement its dictum.
The content fictionalist holds that in (ordinary) utterances of sentences of D some content is asserted, but what is asserted is something other than their literal content.
What is common to all ideas is that indirect assertions are not explicit: what is expressed, or literally said, is not the same as what is asserted.
What is asserted may well be true but it is very difficult to call anybody to account to establish its reliability.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com