Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
To assess how the number of introduced species differs between uses, we compared the proportion of introduced and non-introduced species in each use category with that of species in other use categories (using a Fisher Test in R).
Similar(59)
To evaluate differences between the groups, we compared proportions using chi-square or Fisher's exact test.
Finally, in order to better understand why the association between dual use and mortality exists, we compared the top 15 primary diagnostic codes (ICD9-CMs) for hospital episodes for nonveterans, for veterans who were not dual users of the VHA and Medicare, and for veterans who were dual users.
We compared the associations between use of these substances and lung function in a population-based cohort (n = 1,037).
We compared variables between groups using Wilcoxon rank sum tests.
We compared differences between means using SPSS11.5 statistical software.
We compared outcomes between groups using the χ2 test with the Bonferroni correction.
We compared differences between groups using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
We ask the question whether such a mechanobiological model can differentiate between stents used clinically, and we compare these predictions to a purely mechanical analysis.
& compared between groups using Chi-square test; + compared between groups using ANOVA; # compared between groups using one-way ANOVA with Scheffe post hoc test.
Since signals between species and between chips cannot be compared, we used the Affymetrix Present Absent calls to accomplish this after discussion with Affymetrix Technical Support.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com