Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
Because the variability between two varieties is pretty small, it's easier to use the Heinz 1706 genome as a guide, and pinpoint the differences that lead to changes in color, taste, texture, size and shapethat distinguish one variety from another.
Interchromosomal LD between two varieties is also strong evidence for selection affecting them differently.
Similar(58)
Number of sequence variants in Vesuviano (RSV) and San Marzano (SM) varieties compared to the reference genome (SL240) In brackets is reported the number of unambiguous SNPs In the last column the number of variants in common between the two varieties is shown.
These results suggest that gene flow between the two varieties was historically limited and hybridizations between them were relatively recent events, consistent with earlier observations [14], [15] and at least partially explains the significantly reduced viability of progeny produced by serotypes A and D hybridization.
Although they share almost the same vocabulary, the important divergences in pronunciation and the grammatical differences between the two varieties are so significant that they may be considered two different languages.
Significant differential expression between the two varieties was seen for 221 miRNAs.
However, in contrast to ITS and Tpi, the total genetic variance partitioned between the two varieties was relatively low (13.5%; Table 1), suggesting pronounced allele sharing.
Out of these 76 unigenes, 18 had SNPs outside of the probe sequence, whereas 58 had identical sequence between the two varieties being compared.
The allele frequencies of these loci between populations of two varieties were significantly different; these were gSNP09342 in LG10 and two loci (estSNP03062 and gSNP04589) in LG2 and gSNP09342 in LG10 and three loci (gSNP01805, gSNP02822, and gSNP04480) in LG11.
Two varieties are especially threatened.
Two varieties were recognised: Meissner's var.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com