One important difference between these two terms, which shows the difficulty with translating vijñāna as cognition, is that, according to Śāntarakṣita, a vijñāna always has an object but it does not have to have conceptual content.
Briefly, when comparing two terms in an ontology, two main approaches are generally distinguished, the edge-based, which counts the edges in the graph path between two terms [14] [18], and the node-based, which looks at the properties of the terms, their ancestors and descendants [19] [25].
In this approach it is assumed that the similarity between two terms is captured by their shared information, which is in turn encoded by the information in their common ancestor.
The logarithm version of this approach was suggested in which the similarity between two terms is given by the negative logarithm of the ratio between the length of the shortest path and twice the maximum depth of the hierarchy under consideration [ 6].
Another lessical relationship is hypernymy, which indicates an inclusion relationship between two terms when one of them has a more extensive meaning (i.e. flower-lily).
The thicker of the edge between two terms is, the stronger association between two terms is, and vice versa.
Furthermore, the structure of the ontology introduces dependence between terms, which must be appropriately considered when comparing two graphs.
Therefore, this shared sequence variation between the two models can dominate the likelihood terms, which would result in lack of any significant difference between the likelihoods of the two models.
Drawing on some recent developments in so-called "interactive governance theory", it is argued that fisheries and coastal governance is basically a relationship between two systems, which could be termed a "governing system" and a "system-to-be-governed".
Survival analysis by Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the difference of long-term prognosis between two groups, which also further indicated no significant difference, χ = 2.633, P = 0.105.
