Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
The difference in base composition between two samples indicates the presence of an SNP.
Similar(59)
Epigenetic distance corresponds to a measure of the net dissimilarity in DNA methylation profiles of a given sequence between two samples, indicating the number of pair-wise methylation differences.
A comparison between the two samples indicates that narrower and less connected cleating system results in more frequent coal fines generation and migration, resulting in significant permeability fluctuations with general decreasing trend.
A comparison between the samples indicated that they showed different trends, yet when pooled, the two samples indicated a significant decrease in hazardous use over time following hospitalization.
In the four samples indicated below traces of triamcinolone, a corticosteroid, were found.
Each value of Pearson's correlation coefficient is indicated as follows: 1 indicates perfect positive correlation between two samples, 0.80 to 1.0 indicates very strong correlation, and 0.60 to 0.79 indicates strong correlation.
Also, individual missing transcripts from each gene were equally distributed between two tissue samples, indicating the good reproducibility of these result.
All results were replicated between two random samples, indicating that the WFIRS-P has robust psychometric measurement properties.
Measured fold change in gene expression between two samples was used to set the color of the nodes, green indicating up regulation, red indicating down regulation and yellow indicating no change between samples.
A two-fold cut-off value (log2 ≥ 1) was arbitrarily set to indicate differential gene expression between two samples.
sp Kt/ V, KCALC and KDEL have no normal distribution, so we used a Mann-Whitney test (between two samples) or a Kruskal-Wallis test (between three or more samples) to indicate whether groups had different locations.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com