Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
First, we assess the extent to which the occurrence of a citation between two papers is driven by the similarity between them.
Similar(59)
A key discrepancy between the two papers is that El-Brolosy et al. found that knockout of the upf1 gene prevented NITC, whereas Ma et al. observed that NITC was not impaired by knockdown of Upf1, nor by knockdown of the NMD factors Upf2 and Upf3b.
A more significant difference between the two papers is conceptual: we view the idea of twisting the (bar{partial }) complex as a basic method, one that has led to new (L^2) estimates and provides a framework to obtain additional estimates.
The absence of BTA-13 genes (UQCC and GDF5) as the possible candidate for bovine stature in this study are due to the sensitivity of CSS (and its constituent tests of selection) to the sample composition because the cohort composition between the two papers is quite different regarding inclusion and exclusion of several breeds.
Forty-two papers were published between 1991 and 2013 and one in 1978.
Five papers were rated below 10; eleven between 10 and 20, and three above 20.
Eleven papers were spoiled.
Fifteen papers were included.
Eighteen papers were unavailable.
Seven papers were RCTs.
Nine papers were located.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com