Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
The weighted kappa for CC categorization between two observers was 0.8980 (95% confidence interval: 0.8638 0.9322).
The F-test between two observers was not statistically significant for each MR imaging set.
The variation between two observers was less than 4% during the training period.
Inter-observer agreement between two observers was measured by mean difference and general limits of agreement [ 21].
The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (95%% confidence interval (CI)) between two observers was calculated for both PET and MRI cumulative scores.
Similar(55)
If the difference between two observers were greater than 10%, a consensus was achieved.
Because three other tumors were judged differently by two observers and the average of the two judgments was within the range of equivocal, they were subjected to a re-count: for two tumors, the second judgments also differed between two observers, being positive and equivocal respectively, but the average of the judgments of HER2/ CEP17 ratio exceeded 2.20, so they were finally judged positive.
For the RV data of 3DE, the relative differences between two observers were found to be 11% for EDV, 13% for ESV, 9% for SV and 1% for EF (Table 3), respectively with little but significant difference only for ESV and very good correlation (R > 0.7) for EDV and ESV, and less good correlations for EF (R = 0.58) and SV (R = 0.26).
Reproducibility of the scoring method between three observers was greater than 90%.
The inter-observer reliability between three observers was high: The mean Pearson correlation coefficient for the estimation of looking time for 3 observers for a subset of randomly selected looking events was 0.998 (N = 27 trials).
The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICCs) of the T1ρ values between the two observers was 0.93 (95% CI = 0.84 0.95), indicating good agreement between the observers.
Related(20)
between two reviewers was
between two stripes was
between two scans was
between two parties was
between two men was
between two readers was
between two pregnancies was
between two points was
between two swoopers was
between two cities was
between two maps was
between two flaps was
between two observers were
between two openings was
between two peaks was
between two counties was
between two barricades was
between two drugs was
between two sites was
between two stages was
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com