Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(3)
Figure 28 gives the temperature profile comparison between two models in the high flowrate case.
The differences between two models in simulation results are shown in Figs. 4, 5 and 6.
It allows us to check the equivalence between two models in different levels of abstraction, e.g., a Register Transfer Level (RTL) implementation and a non-cycle-accurate specification.
Similar(57)
Importantly, while a model maximising u treated will also maximise u untreated, the difference between two models will (in general) be different with respect to u treated or u untreated, as we shall see in our example.
Analytical throughput comparison between two models is shown in Fig. 8.
Step 3 Iterative coupling between two models: The fluid flow in porous media alters the stresses, porosity, and permeability.
The distribution is quite different between the two models, in particular, the southwestern region from the source.
These two representations are compared with a view to unveil differences between the two models in terms of emotion recognition rate.
A specific example is used to clearly demonstrate the differences in behaviour between the two models in hydrostatic tension and compression.
Subtle differences are observed between the two models in cases that involved such high levels of cohesion that the particle bed could not fully fluidize.
Comparison between the two models in face centered cubic systems yields quantification of the contribution of rotational defects to internal energy.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com