Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(2)
Exact(3)
The agreement between two methods were within a range of 23 mm and 65%, and 10 mm and 45% for the air gap thickness and contact area of upper and lower body garments, respectively.
The sensitivity and specificity between two methods were not statistically significant except in detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Among 13 patients whose image findings between two methods were discordant and tissue confirmation was difficult, the treatment decision was made in 7 patients based on PET/CT, showing the final diagnostic accuracy of 42.8% (3/7).
Similar(57)
The mainly difference between two methods is that the processing of the covariance matrix.
A high correlation indicates that the order of the chemotype discovery between two methods is similar.
The discrepancy between two methods is due to sample preparations, irradiation facility and geometry.
For rock music, violin solo, and speech, the LSD difference between two methods is with the range of ±0.3 dB.
The difference between two methods is calculated according to the equation: Difference = equation depth − layer cake depth.
The values obtained between two methods are positive in the shallower part and appears to be negative in the deeper part below the salt.
The difference in performance between two methods is relevant which results from the importance of taking into account mode signs when calculating the contrast function.
The comparison of the performance between two methods is obvious according to the TPA values in the table.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com