Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
Conclusions: Although this study showed no significant difference between two groups regarding effectiveness, adverse effects and mortality, patients on propofol obtained quicker convulsion control and better return to baseline condition.
However, there were no meaningful differences between two groups regarding mentioned variables.
No differences were found between two groups regarding serum MDA and TAS and oxidative burst on PMNs and MCs but both groups were different to group sham.
*There was no significant difference between two groups regarding location of the lesions (p = 0.07) ** There was no significant difference between two groups regarding type of the lesions (p = 0.17) In the glucantime alone treated group, 32 patients (71.1%) had complete cure where as in the group treated with both glucantime & topical honey, 23 patients (51.1%) achieved complete cure.
No significant difference (p > 0.05) was observed between two groups regarding anthropometric variables (BMI and NC), questionnaire (ESS), and HR, while significant difference was found for age (p < 0.001), ODI4A (p < 0.05), and AHI (p < 0.01).
No statistically significant difference was noted between two groups regarding pain scores (VAS, Mayo and PPT) and success rate in all follow up examinations including 4,8 weeks and 6 and 12 months after initiating therapy (Tables 2, 3, 4 and 5, Figures 2, 3 and 4).
Similar(53)
There was no significant difference between four groups regarding PaCO2, pH.
Significant differ ences were found between the two groups regarding the dependent measures.
There were differences between the two groups regarding the application of sanctions.
There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the functional results.
There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the appropriate use of gastrointestinal decontamination.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com