Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Sample size estimation with a 95% confidence interval and statistical power of 80% showed that 247 children with at least six emerged surfaces at risk permitted to assess a ratio ≥ 2 between two groups considering an estimate of 2.5% (3 decayed surfaces in each 120 surfaces) in the control group [ 22].
Similar(59)
Similarly, total microbial growth did not differ between the two groups considering the tracheal aspirate samples collected before extubation.
CI was significantly different between the two groups considering that mean VIS at PCICU admission was similar (p = 0.29).
Figure 2 illustrates the cumulative probability function showing the likelihood of cost difference between the two groups considering hospitalizations due to HF and LV lead surgical revision.
There were no differences between the two groups considering age, histology, nuclear grade, lymph vascular invasion (LVI), downstaging after NAC based on pathological response, use of hormonal therapy, Ki-67 index, and percentage of ER and PgR.
With respect to 90-day mortality, patients with a severe AH who died (n = 14) had a lower admission median albumin (27 vs. 30 g/L; P = 0.05) and a higher median creatinine (74.5 vs. 53 mmol/L; P = 0.05) as compared to those who survived, whereas no other differences were detected between the two groups considering all 30-/90-day 30-/90-dayincluded in Table 2 (data not shown).
Other entomologists, while recognizing the proximity of relationship between these two groups, consider that the relationship is of superorder value and that features separating the two groups are of sufficient magnitude to warrant full ordinal status for each group.
As concerns BI-1 expression, a statistically significant difference (P < 0.0001 by Kruskal Wallis test) emerged between the five groups considered (Control, CH, CIRR, PHCC, HCC).
It evaluates the average log-ratio between two groups and considers as differentially expressed all genes that differ by more than an arbitrary cut-off.
Differences between two groups were considered significant at the P < 0.05 level.
A difference between two groups was considered significant when P < 0.05.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com