Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(23)
For comparison between two groups, a paired or unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test or Mann and Whitney's U-test was used.
When comparing gene expression levels between two groups, a probe was included in the analysis if its intensity exceeded the background in at least 80% of the animals from at least 1 group.
4. Stage a debate between two groups: a group that believes excavating tombs is a disrespectful practice and a group that believes tomb excavation has scientific and cultural merit. 5. Perform an "apple mummification" experiment modeled after Newton's Apple-Mummies (//ericir.syr.edu/Projects/Newton/13/lessons/mummy.html).html
All remaining analyses utilized non-parametric methods: a two-tailed Mann-Whitney test for comparisons between two groups, a Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunns post-hoc tests for comparisons between three or more groups; EAE data was analyzed using a Wilcoxon matched pairs test.
For the assessment item that asked students to distinguish between two groups (a more general comparison than they had considered in class), 77% of students achieved a score of 1 or 2 for their first reason.
For comparison between two groups, a Student's t-test was performed.
Similar(37)
To evaluate the differences between two groups, an independent t test was performed, and for comparisons between three or four groups, one-way ANOVA was performed.
To determine statistical significance between two groups an unpaired Student's t-test was performed.
In the coronal plane, a significant difference was found in the correction rate of the major curve (group A: 84.8%, group B: 78.4%; P=0.045) and in the Cincinnati Correction Index between two groups (group A: 2.21, group B: 1.98; P=0.047).
The participants were randomly allocated between two groups; group A and group B. Fig. 1 CPRcard on Push Heart (left) and CPRcard on Little Anne (right).
A clash between two groups at a polling station in Chaman on the border with Afghanistan left least three people dead and several others hurt.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com