Exact(1)
A comparative study was made between two designs of benzalkonium ion (Bz -selective electrodes: a silver-coated (solid contact) called electrode A and a PVC memBz -selective innelectrodes) called electrode B based on benzalkonium-phosphomolybdate (Bz-PM) asolid-excontact calledx.
Similar(59)
Several comparisons are made between the cutaway trawl and three designs of commercial trawl in existing use in Nephrops fisheries.
We found no statistically significant difference between the two designs in terms of ROM, knee scores (KSS, HSS, WOMAC, and SF-36), patients' satisfaction and complications.
To assess whether improved reproducibility in the heterogenized design was caused by heterogenization shifting variation from between-experiment variation to within-experiment variation, within-experiment variances were averaged across the six laboratories and compared between the two designs for each of the 29 behavioral measures.
We included both randomized and non-randomized controlled studies in our analyses, but found no difference between those two designs in terms of effect sizes for alcohol or depression.
To minimize the influence of differences between the two designs on the results of the comparative analysis, we identified the intersection of the capture designs and excluded variants located outside the regions of overlap.
No significant difference was observed between the two designs regarding postoperative range of flexion, clinical scores, quality of life outcomes, or complication rate.
There are two key differences between the two designs: (a) the number of randomisation periods for each patient; and (b) the method of randomisation.
The second key difference between the two designs is the method of randomisation.
For identical sequences of patients, the difference between the two designs in trial duration and numbers of patients treated is highly variable.
We prove a proposition asserting conditions under which the robustness curves for two different designs will cross one another, entailing the potential for reversal of preference between the two designs.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com