Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Given the variability of estimates of CEs and the lack of a clear statistical definition for the equality between two CEs, we applied several criteria: we counted responses where the difference between two CEs was either ±2% (the strictest criterion), ±4%, ±6%, or ±8% (the most lenient criterion) of the range of lottery outcomes.
Similar(58)
We iterated this procedure, using previously established CE as the outcomes in new gambles, until we had between seven and nine CEs corresponding to utilities of 0, 0.063, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 0.875, 0.938, and 1.0 util (in the example session shown in Figure S1E, seven points were measured, and the two corresponding to 0.063 and 0.938 were omitted).
Electrolyte was injected into the space between the two CEs.
This will reduce the performance gap between the two CE schemes.
We can see that in this case, there is a performance gap of 0.05 bps/Hz between the two CE scheme in the uncoded case, and 0.02 bps/Hz in the coded case.
There was a good level of consistency between the two CE experts' findings, with a value of 0.66.
Two CE experts (with experience of reporting more than 150 CE videos) separately read and interpreted the complete CE videos.
To further confirm that TPP inhibits the activities of the specific TPP target Ces enzymes, we next tested whether TPP inhibits p-nitrophenyl acetate hydrolytic activity in HEK293T lysates overexpressing the five Ces TPP targets.
This result is attributed to the ion exchanges in the surface layer of electrode membrane containing OH− groups and redox transition between two oxidation states of Ce(III) oxide and Ce(IV) oxide.
We can choose between two or three.
Assuming that one or the other is prior if the neutral claim is true,[2] we have distinguished between two forms of normativity: meaning/content 'engendered' (ME/CE) normativity and meaning/content determining (MD/CD) normativity (cf. Glüer & Wikforss 2009).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com