Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
An almost linear correlation was found between those two parameters and complemented by supporting data from the literature.
The relation between those two parameters is highlighted by Eq. (3).
However, we did not observed any inverse correlation between those two parameters.
This could be an explanation for the fact that in our linear regression analysis we did not find a significant association between those two parameters.
Prior retrospective studies, except for the recent meta-analysis (Kyzas et al, 2005a), did not show any correlation between those two parameters (Salven et al, 1997; Maeda et al, 1998; Mineta et al, 2000; Tae et al, 2000; Do et al, 2004; Kyzas et al, 2005b).
Good and very good correlations (r always ≥0.61) can be observed comparing both functional and structural indices with RGC count both in the central macular area and paracentral one which correspond to the 24 2 visual field.> -wrap-foot> Indicathatthet the correlation between those two parameters is not statistically significant (p > 0.01).
Similar(54)
No differences could be noticed between groups for those two parameters.
Greenshields model defines three corresponding relationship between those three parameters.
The relation between these two parameters and geometric characteristics of tangent sections was studied.
The interaction between these two parameters plays an important role in external wall temperature.
A linear correlation was found between these two parameters at larger oocyte diameter (>150 μm).
More suggestions(16)
between those two measures
between those two speeches
between those two stages
between those two things
between those two titles
between those two extremes
between those two stores
between those two positions
between those two dynamics
between those two views
between those two markets
between those two cliches
between those two yields
between those two styles
between those two elements
between those two books
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com