Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Ratios between these values did not allow for distinction between the two PRRSV types.
Similar(59)
The accuracy of EBVs was, nevertheless, equally high for R, S + IND and S + AVER, and these values did not essentially differ between the two selection intensities.
As these values did not significantly differ between groups, we cannot attribute hypotension to hypovolemia.
These values did not differ significantly between the two assay systems (Table 1).
Due to correlations between explanatory variables, these values do not necessarily sum to 100%.
This was solely to facilitate comparison between the different methods, and these values do not necessarily fall in the normally useful ranges of those parameters.
Calculation of 95% credible intervals indicates that the differences between CI values did not occur by chance (figure 1A and online supplementary table S1).
Calculation of 95% credible intervals indicates that the differences between CI values did not occur by chance (see online supplementary table S3).
The difference between values did not exceed 5%.
Comparisons between different cycling-off values did not result in any statistically significant changes for the evaluated variables.
There was not a significant difference in the basal heart rate between the 2 groups, whereas postsurgery values did differ significantly between the 2 groups.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com