Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(46)
When dividing the patients into two subgroups according to their median PTH (203 pg/mL), the slopes of the regression lines of BUA to BMDc were significantly different between these two subgroups (p = 0.052).
Few studies have searched for possible pathophysiological differences between these two subgroups of patients.
At baseline, compared with the VO2-non-responders, lactate levels and ∆PCO2/∆ContO2 and ∆ContCO2/∆ContO2 ratios were significantly higher in VO2-responders, whereas ScvO2 value was not significantly different between these two subgroups (Table 2).
The magnitude of decrease in lactate levels was not different between these two subgroups (13 ± 7 % for VO2-responders vs. 13 ± 10%% for VO2-non-responders, p = 0.98, Table 2).
The demographics and genotyping frequencies did not differ between these two subgroups (complete data not shown).
The differences in T-cell responses between these two subgroups could not be linked to different affinity to Aq.
Similar(14)
There were no significant differences between the demographic characteristics of these two subgroups.
Log-rank tests (P=0.99) confirmed that there is no difference between the overall cancer incidence of these two subgroups within the cohort.
Analysis of variance of DNA methylation between these four subgroups identified 56 probes differentially altered.
We assessed the association between these three subgroups of health literacy levels and glycemic control outcomes.
There were no significant differences between these three subgroups for this question (p = 0.69; Fig. 1).
More suggestions(16)
between these two factors
between these two parts
between these two subtypes
between these two clusters
between these two subunits
between these two processing
between these two sub clusters
between these two ages
between these two candidates
between these two films
between these two points
between these two teams
between these two cases
between these two possibilities
between these two stances
between these two layers
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com