Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
Exact(5)
The results, as shown in Fig. 2c, there was significant difference in the soil porosities of the substratum (50 80 cm) between these two sampling sites at the 0.05 level, but no significant difference (at the 0.05 level) in those of the surface soil layer (0 20 cm) and subsoil layer (20 50 cm) between these two sampling sites.
At the surface soil layer (0 20 cm) and subsoil layer (20 50 cm), there was no significant difference in the soil particle densities, bulk densities and porosities between these two sampling sites at the 0.05 level.
There was significant difference in the soil water content of the subsoil layer (20 50 cm) and substratum (50 80 cm) between these two sampling sites at the 0.05 level, while there was no significant difference (at the 0.05 level) for the surface soil layer (0 20 cm).
The eight soybean genotypes were examined at 3 and 5 dai, and ~25,000 genes had statistically significant responses to infection, with little difference in transcript levels between these two sampling time points [ 20, 22].
While direct comparison of the Framvaren and Cariaco communities is complicated by multiple physico-chemical differences between these two sampling locations, it is possible to distinguish protistan communities on the basis of community composition in the supersulfidic Framvaren Fjord with an interface located in the photic zone from those in the deep-sea anoxic and less sulfidic environment.
Similar(54)
Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between these two samples (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001).
Asterisks indicate significant differences between these two samples (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001).
On the other hand, a substantial difference of crystallization behaviors was observed between these two samples.
The difference in mean score between these two samples is not significant (p < 0.891).
The corresponding curves for the other samples lay in between these two samples, in the order of their MBA content.
The result was in agreement with the TBARS values (Figure 1B), in which there was no difference between these two samples.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com