Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Due to the temporal distance between these two sample times it is probable that the oxidation occurred in much <90 min and that biogenic Mn-oxide is more reactive in a small time window than indicated by the reported kobserved.
WBC, CRP, and IL-6 blood levels were compared between these two sample groups.
DNA amplification was frequent at a wide chromosomal region 17q12-q21 in both the cell lines and tissue specimens, though other BAC clones with frequent DNA amplification were considerably different between these two sample groups (Table 3).
Similar(56)
The difference in mean score between these two samples is not significant (p < 0.891).
On the other hand, a substantial difference of crystallization behaviors was observed between these two samples.
The corresponding curves for the other samples lay in between these two samples, in the order of their MBA content.
The result was in agreement with the TBARS values (Figure 1B), in which there was no difference between these two samples.
The results, as shown in Fig. 2c, there was significant difference in the soil porosities of the substratum (50 80 cm) between these two sampling sites at the 0.05 level, but no significant difference (at the 0.05 level) in those of the surface soil layer (0 20 cm) and subsoil layer (20 50 cm) between these two sampling sites.
At the surface soil layer (0 20 cm) and subsoil layer (20 50 cm), there was no significant difference in the soil particle densities, bulk densities and porosities between these two sampling sites at the 0.05 level.
Even though there is no significant value of band gap energies, the absorption values between these two samples are different whereas calcined TiO2 shows higher absorption values of UV light which is useful to improve the photocatalytic performance.
Our results show that there is no significant difference in the thicknesses between these two samples, and the differences are within the range of errors - the sample in Figure 3a has a nominal thickness of 25 nm, while the sample in Figure 3d has a nominal thickness of 22 nm.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com