Sentence examples for between these two evaluation from inspiring English sources

I also explore whether characteristics of the prizes or the papers correlate with this difference in outcomes between peer review and citation counts and find there is no easy way to reduce the difference in outcomes between these two evaluation methods.

A second evaluation ψ n + 1 = ψ n + Δ t ∑ i = 1 N − 1 b ∗ i k i accurate at order N − 1, which uses an other ponderation { b ∗ i }, i = 1, 2, …, N. The difference between these two evaluations gives an estimate of the approximation error of the scheme: ϵ = Δ t ∑ i = 1 N − 1 ( b i − b ∗ i ) k i. (30).

The differences in absolute values of accuracy between these two evaluations are due to different ratios of non-MoRF to MoRF residues.

There is a striking similarity between these three evaluations and the HHSRF compared favorably in all payback categories.

To examine the nature of this interaction effect, simple effects ANOVA analyses were then performed for the two self-view groups separately.> Results for these participants showed that time spent on positive feedback did not differ between the two evaluation outcome conditions (F (1, 38) = 1.03, p > .20).20

The major differences between the two evaluation boards were the different GPU module and the different ARM processor module.

Chi-square analysis shows significant differences in the distribution of the responses between the two evaluation methods regarding reliability (p < 0.01) and relevance (p < 0.001).

Even small differences between the two evaluation methods are thus expected to have consequences for studies which are not clearly reliable or unreliable, respectively.

A much higher percentage (40%%) of participants chose category "not assignable" (R4) for study G. Similar patterns were observed for studies D and F. In order to illustrate methodological differences between the two evaluation methods a more detailed analysis of the evaluations for studies D, E, and G, which showed significant differences between evaluation methods, is provided below.

Change over time between the two evaluation groups therefore was not statistically different.

There is a 2 3-week interval between the two evaluation appointments.