Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
In contrast, specificity between these two cutoff points increased from 60.7% to 71.3%.
Similar(58)
With decreasing magnetic field or increasing particle energy these two cutoff latitudes (Fig. 6(c)) move towards each other, i.e. the polar cutoff latitude moves towards the equator and vice versa.
These two cutoff values were used for the calculation of sensitivities and specificities.
We then use these two cutoffs to construct the binary interaction networks (Fig. 1 d).
Finally, they analyzed these three cutoffs and proposed the combination of threshold and relative cutoffs, in which mantained candidates that have t f- d c f >2 and correspond up to 15% of the ranked candidades.
We assign such a t-test p value to five different transcript variant association cutoffs (the five cutoffs partition the association range into 6 equally sized groups) and record the top −log t-test p value across these five cutoffs.
In this case, results falling between the two cutoffs can either be classified as test failures or be passed for further analysis.
The choice between the two cutoffs depends on the goal of research, but for the identification of putative HGT events, the conservative cutoff is preferred as it meets a balance between precision and recall (see Results and Discussion).
For the other items, differences in the relative contribution to the information between the two cutoffs were also small, which means that for differentiating respondents around the higher cutoff (X+ = 12), the relative importance of the items is the same as for differentiating around the lower cutoff (X+ = 9).
The ROC curve calculated did not reveal a cutoff point that could allow adequate differentiation between these two types of lesions (57.1% sensitivity, 66.7% specificity, 36.37% PPV, and a 64.30% accuracy for a Glx-Cr ratio ≥1.25).
A surprisingly nonsurprising cutoff (52% GDT-TS) defines the boundary between these two groups.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com