Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Rivaroxaban demonstrated superiority in the on-treatment analysis (p = 0.015), but not in the ITT analysis (p = 0.12), despite the fact that there is only a difference of 28 patients between these two analysis groups (Table 5).
Similar(59)
The Fisher F test applied to the differences between the two analysis groups showed that these were statistically significant.
Correlation between the two analysis methods was examined by intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis.
Notably, no correlation or agreement between the two analysis methods was found when separating the values for baseline and shock.
First, electric utilities have adopted cleaner sources of electricity to their mix between the two analysis.
There was a statistically significant difference between the two analysis subgroups (p < 0.001).
There was no apparent difference in the outcome between these two arms (Analysis 1.9).
However, the actual relationship between these two varies from analysis to analysis.
Focussing on the interplay between these two approaches, landscape analysis and landscape modelling will improve our understanding of pattern process interactions.
Thus, the main difference between these two types of analysis is whether the arterial capacitance is computed.
In an effort to distinguish between these two possibilities further analysis of SKA2 and miRNA transcription was performed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com