Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(12)
The aim of this EORTC database study was to study the difference in prognosis between these subgroups in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for advanced STS.
We also compared biomarker values and patient-rated outcomes between these subgroups in the adults.
There were no statistically significant differences between these subgroups in any of the other methodological criteria shown in Tables 1, 2, 3 and 4. ns, not significant.
Differences in agreement between these subgroups in weighted Kappa were compared.
There was no significant differences between these subgroups in regard to this.
We interpreted differences between these subgroups in terms of longitudinal changes, as based on between-group statistical differences.
Similar(48)
Also, both normal subjects and subjects with type 1 and type 2 diabetes were enrolled in numbers sufficient to conclude that the relationship between the two variables was consistent between these subgroups and also in relation to other important variables (i.e., age, ethnicity, smoking).
We have not found any significant difference in TLR expression between these two subgroups in our patient groups.
Women from African and Caribbean backgrounds are often grouped together for research purposes, but there is evidence of variation between these ethnic subgroups in other behavioural risk factors for cervical cancer (smoking status and sexual behaviour [ 13, 14]).
Although no significant differences were detected between these two subgroups in relation to DFS (P=0.6606) and OS (P=0.2501), we found that OS was worse in patients with tumours expressing c-erbB-2/c-erbB-3 heterodimers compared to those with tumours expressing c-erbB-2/c-erbB-2 homodimer.
Data from the LEAD trials of liraglutide 57 64676973 73 were initially grouped into quartiles of baseline heart rate and demonstrated significant variations in effect between these subgroups, with the greatest increase seen in those with the lowest baseline values.
More suggestions(16)
between these factors in
between these subpopulations in
between these populations in
between these teams in
between these dates in
between these GCases in
between these alternatives in
between these robots in
between these rites in
between these bands in
between these extremes in
between these elements in
between these powerhouses in
between these pathways in
between these times in
between these problems in
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com