Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
The most important features and differences between these procedures are summarized in Table 1.
Similar(59)
Some loss of microbial viability between the time of removal of the endotracheal tube from the patient and its subsequent processing for culture is likely, despite the time between these procedures being kept as short as possible.
No significant difference between the results of these procedures was found for postoperative complications or the need for reoperation.
Significant variability in these procedures was observed between countries.
All these procedures were crosschecked between the two reviewers.
The performances of the two procedures are studied for a large-size problem and a comparison between the procedures is then made.
Wassmer [ 16] concluded that "no substantial differences between the procedures were found in terms of rejection regions, power, and expected sample sizes".
The difference between step A and step B is defined in the overarching standard of the EPBD and the main difference between these two procedures is related to the method to evaluate the electricity delivered to the grid.
Difference of pain scores between these two procedures was not significant (BPS, P = 0.90: CPOT, P = 0.68; NVPS, P = 0.40).
The main cause of discrepancies between these rates, assuming proper design procedures are followed, is the improper estimation of possible well rates, i.e. inaccurate data on well inflow performance.
Differences between PAPI and CAPI procedures are marginal with respect to self-report personality measures.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com