Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
For all mixes, the parameters were analyzed by the work-of-fracture method (WFM) and by the size effect method (SEM) and consequently a correlation between these methods was obtained which is used to calibrate cracking numerical models.
The congruence between these methods was much higher at the group level with group separation values of 95% for the relationship between MLVA and spa-sequence type grouping and 89% for that of MLVA and PFGE.
Linear correlation between these methods was shown.
The reason is that the results from these methods vary over a wide range and a compromise between these methods was expected to better predict results.
The combination of over-estimation by the questionnaires and under-estimation by the accelerometer may have given rise to the observation that the difference between these methods was greater at higher levels of activity.
The difference between these methods was likely caused by a combination of two deficiencies: the observed imprecision of the AgSCSN(CH2CH3 2 method at relatively high As concentrations, and the observed bias of the GFAAS method at all As concentrations.
Similar(53)
The accuracy achieved by these methods was between 71.23% and 77.54%, which was lower than the proposed approach.
The agreement between these methods is generally good.
Nevertheless, the difference between these methods is a relatively small one, and their results mostly overlap within their respective margins of uncertainty.
The essential difference between these methods is that the tethering hybrid DNA is immobile in the first, while it is mobile in the second.
The main differences between these methods were time and temperature at which the modification was carried out, the concentration of a base used during the modification, and the water content in the catalysts used for further modification.
More suggestions(19)
between these approaches was
between these mechanisms was
between these means was
between these measures was
between these measurements was
between these animals was
between these models was
between these species was
between these methods were
between these foes was
between these metrics was
between these dates was
between these points was
between these analyses was
between these microbes was
between these elements was
between these extremes was
between these artists was
between these predictors was
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com