Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(21)
The agreement between these methods is generally good.
Nevertheless, the difference between these methods is a relatively small one, and their results mostly overlap within their respective margins of uncertainty.
The essential difference between these methods is that the tethering hybrid DNA is immobile in the first, while it is mobile in the second.
Thus, the performance comparison between these methods is fair.
The main difference between these methods is shown in Figure 9, depicting the zoomed-in images.
(Fairview is another project doing the same, but the precise differentiation between these methods is not yet clear).
Similar(39)
Thus, the estimated uplift force at the site of rupture using both of these methods is between 183 kN and 426 kN.
A comparison between the results obtained by these methods is made.
For all mixes, the parameters were analyzed by the work-of-fracture method (WFM) and by the size effect method (SEM) and consequently a correlation between these methods was obtained which is used to calibrate cracking numerical models.
The main differences between these methods were time and temperature at which the modification was carried out, the concentration of a base used during the modification, and the water content in the catalysts used for further modification.
Nevertheless, the main interconnections between these methods are shown and application examples are given.
More suggestions(20)
between these terms is
between these means is
between these measurements is
between these devices is
between these approaches is
between these processes is
between these principles is
between these modes is
between these mechanisms is
between these measures is
between these values is
between these factors is
between these populations is
between these parameters is
between these molecules is
between these strains is
between these pathways is
between these components is
between these areas is
between these sites is
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com