Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(24)
Driven by the geospatial and management work of Audubon Vermont, the partnership is connecting land trusts and bird conservation organizations and fostering collaboration between these groups for bird conservation.
But when we tested the differences between these groups for speed, quantity focus, and impatience we came upon some intriguing results: first, we found that leaders in countries with more paid vacation days actually tend to seem slightly more likely to work at a faster pace, have a higher quantity focus, and feel more impatient.
However, there was no significant difference between these groups for the interval from PGF to ovulation (average, 9.8 d), embryo recovery rate (average, 75%), embryo quality, uterine protein concentration, and pregnancy rate in recipient mares (average, 87% at 15 d after ovulation, with no pregnancy loss detected by 60 d).
No differences were observed between these groups for any of the three DAP metabolites.
The primary clinical measure of effect is the frequency of angina attacks between these groups for four weeks after randomization.
Differences between these groups for continuous data were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a post hoc Bonferroni.
Similar(36)
There are not any differences between these groups except for the PI3K values.
Most clinical and laboratory parameters were similar between these groups except for hypertension.
While there were no significant differences in these outcomes between these groups, scores for paramedical staff were significantly lower, at 73%.
There was no significant difference between these groups, either for illumination after a single drug dose or a double drug dose.
Graphic representations of the mean scores ± standard errors for the NI and I groups are shown in Figure 1, with significant differences between these groups indicated for each test, at each time point after the end of the intervention program.
More suggestions(15)
between these habitats for
between these objectives for
between these modulations for
between these results for
between these spaces for
between these methods for
between these variables for
between these statistics for
between these tools for
between these patterns for
between these problems for
between these factors for
between these cytokines for
between these decoders for
between these trends for
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com