Sentence examples for between the visual target from inspiring English sources

The semantic relation between the visual target and the ambiguous prime verb was manipulated to investigate whether a particular meaning of an ambiguous verb was activated.

Errors between the visual target and the estimated state of the limb produce corrective responses to ensure the hand reaches the target.

This resulted in duration differences between the visual target stimuli and auditory nontarget stimuli ranging from −350 to +350 ms.

Furthermore, do the differences between the center-aligned and center-shifted conditions result from a mere difference in the amount of temporal overlap between the visual targets and auditory nontargets, or does the actual timing of the on- and offsets of the stimuli play the crucial role we predicted?

Strong correlations were found between correct responses to the visual target and the theta band in the frontal lobe, the total power in the medial of the parietal lobe and the theta-to-beta ratio in the left side of the occipital lobe.

As such, there was a greater temporal overlap between the processing of the visual target and the auditory distractor in the high-load condition (in which the target search took longer) than in the low-load condition, and this may have offset the effect of load.

The effects of the relationship between the 'odour' size and the visual target size on the degree of motion covariation within the hand during reaching for the target were assessed as follows.

The timing between the initial saccade to the visual target and the magnetic pulses (called TMS stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) in the following) was 40 ms. For experiment 2 (TD_nHF), an additional later TMS SOA of 80 ms was used, resulting in 3 levels for the variable TMS in this case (80 ms/no ms/no).

The timing desynchronization between the auditory prime word and the visual target word allows researchers to determine whether a meaning is active at a particular time point of lexical access.

Thus, according to this model, the difference between the grasp plans activated by the visual target and by the olfactory stimulus is essential for hand shaping interference effects to be observed.

An alternative, more trivial explanation for our results might be that our observers strategically switched to reporting differences between the auditory nontarget duration and the visual target duration when they were unable to reach a decision about a difference between visual target durations.