Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(59)
In addition, the effectiveness of the intervention differed between the two study sites.
Anthropometric and metabolic parameters at baseline were comparable between the two study groups (Table 1).
No significant differences in the laboratory safety parameters were found between the two study groups.
Despite this fact, no significant differences in the laboratory safety parameters were found between the two study groups (Figure 1).
Dietary adherence as assessed from the Eating Self-Efficacy Scale was comparable between the two study groups.
At 1 and 4 weeks, however, ambulatory pH monitoring demonstrated no difference in acid suppression between the two study arms.
Analysis of the data demonstrated a significant difference between the two study groups (P = 0.033).
There was no crossover between the two study arms.
Similarly, no statistical difference in ETCO2 was found between the two study groups.
There were no statistically significant differences between the two study groups at month 6.
Similar(1)
Demographic information and health conditions were balanced between the two study arms at baseline.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com