The difference between the two sample means, x̄1 − x̄2, would be used as a point estimate of the difference between the two population means.
However, four differences between the two sample groups were found.
However, there was a significant deviation between the two sample series for d WO3 < 3 nm.
Significant and reproducible differences between the two sample morphologies are also observed.
The damage resulting from the subsequent displacement cascades differs significantly between the two sample geometries.
Supervised Fisher ratio analysis permitted the identification of compounds responsible for the chemical differences between the two sample types.
Differences between the two sample means, which were from the weekend and weekend samples, respectively, were significant in all cases.
This work has several limitations including the differential attrition rate between the two sample populations, which made it unreliable to perform in-depth analyses across populations.
Application of the PERMANOVA test further confirmed the lack of difference between the two sample types in bulk REE content ((P > 0.5) from 10,000 permutations).
This is done because no significant differences in δ13C or δ15N of fish between the two sample events for each site were found (ANOVA, all p > 0.05).
Meanwhile, the water-added sample shows plastic strain localization in addition to fracturing and reaction products composed of zoisite grains and SiO2 materials along the boundary between the two sample cores.
