For all other methodological criteria established by EFSA, we only found differences between the two peer-reviewed publications that did not exceed the normal range of differences exhibited by all published experiments that study a similar issue with similar protocols, including those considered for regulatory purposes.
Figure 2 shows that bandwidth consumption does not grow linearly with the total set size, as long as the set size difference between the two peers is small.
To address the second research objective of our study, that is, the relationships between the four (peer, co-worker, patient and self) measurement perspectives, we used Pearsons' correlation coefficient using the mean score of all items.
The kappa coefficient for the agreement between the two investigators (peer review) was 0.76.
However, there were growing examples of synergy between the activities of the two different peer educator groups [ 54].
For example, approaches to be considered include promoting synergy between the two schemes of peer educators for prevention and care [ 64].
In some cases, several links allow for the contact between two peers, in which case there are several contact opportunities, one per available link for the contact.
The SET service provides a generic interface for set operations between two peers; the operations currently implemented are the IBF-based set reconciliation and set intersection [54].
If the traffic exchanged between two peers is less than a threshold Ψ Mbps they peer publicly at an IXP, otherwise they peer privately.
However, the time-stamped packets between two peers would provide a hint for correlating the intercepted packets in case the encryption of the counter got compromised.
We now summarize the experimental results for the bounded set reconciliation protocol between two peers.
