Sentence examples for between the two formulations from inspiring English sources

Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution were evaluated, and differences were observed between the two formulations.

Free drug and drug-loaded nanoparticles were tested to discriminate between the two formulations.

Pharmacodynamically, no significant differences in SDMT scores between the two formulations were found.

Values of the equivalent bending stiffness 〈EI〉 are compared between the two formulations.

The maximum ratio between the two formulations in Model D is 1.8 for silicate and 2.2 for carbonaceous dust.

Screening of ofloxacin-loaded nanoparticles for antibacterial activity with aqueous ofloxacin solution revealed no significant difference between the two formulations.

The results came as a surprise in comparison with traditional USP II tests, which were performed with 900 mL of simple buffered media, where the pH was raised by the buffered formulations only to values around 4, thus prohibiting discrimination between the two formulation designs (unpublished results).

The information from reference materials allowed interpretation of the compositional differences between the six formulations.

Further, comparisons between the three formulations show that desogestrel-only users not only had the highest RR for changing to a different type of hormonal contraceptive but also the lowest RR for having a second dispensation identical to the first.

Results were very similar, though significance levels varied, between the three formulations of the regression model that compared the local meteorologic station data and those from the interpolated climatology data (33, 34).

Williams et al. (2000) conducted a retrospective analysis of 96 women receiving vaginal progesterone gel (90 mg twice daily) or vaginal progesterone tablet (200 mg three times daily) or IMP (50 mg once daily) and reported no significant difference in pregnancy rates between the three formulations.