Sentence examples for between the two forests from inspiring English sources

Baseflow recession rates were nearly equal between the two forests, as were stormflow coefficients (4% and 5% for MAT and SEC, respectively).

The D index clearly highlights differences between the two forests leading to a high-level in their acoustic classification (Fig. 3).

D index essentially reveals a difference between the two forests (distance-based redundancy analysis [53] with 1,000 permutations, df = 1, F = 46.730, P<0.001).

Indexes reveal for this small sample a lower acoustic diversity for the most disturbed forest and acoustic dissimilarities between the two forests suggest that degradation could have significantly decreased and modified community composition.

The peak due to this cicada species was the most striking difference between the two forests at 5.30 5.45 pm (dusk1) as shown by the frequency spectrum of the degraded forest when the cicada species was exceptionally absent (Fig. 4).

Overall, C. glareolus was most commonly collected (49.8%); however, the proportion of the different species varied greatly between the two forests: bank voles accounted for 57.6% of captures in Elan but only for 27.5% of captures in Hazelles (χ²=13.65, p = 2.10-4), where they were overtaken in frequency by Apodemus flavicollis (29.6%).

Fungal species composition was different between the two forest types.

Abundances and viability differed more between the upper and lower HSI estimates than between the two forest management scenarios.

Moreover, predicted trends in tree drought stress were mainly due to changes in leaf area occurred between the two forest inventories rather than to climatic trends.

Our study suggested that differences in fungal community structure between the two forest types strongly reflect the preference of fungal species for different host substrates and vegetation structure, and that each forest type maintains specialists for the dominant trees.

None of the means of aboveground coarse wood production (p = 0.06), mortality (p = 0.37) and recruitment (p = 0.39) differed significantly at p < 0.05 between the two forest types.