Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
Due to this, the >90% homology between the two evaluating methods can be considered most satisfactory.
Similar(59)
Between the four evaluated groups no significant differences were found in the quantity of SP-B and SP-C (Fig. 4).
Spearman rank sum test was utilised to statistically compare the degree of correlation between the two persons evaluating HMGB1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry. p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
We also observed that there were no differences between the two devices evaluated.
One explanation is differences between the two populations evaluated.
We use the difference between the two to evaluate the reliability of different strategies for adjusting for lead time in estimation of overdiagnosis.
Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Student's t-test to determine the statistical significance between the two means evaluated at P < 0.05.
Results were fitted to quadratic models describing the inherent relationships between the four factors evaluated and nasal spray performance.
Relationship between the nine and eleven traits evaluated under control and salinity in 2010 and 2011.
The majority of students completed both sets of exercises, resulting in very different sample sizes between the three populations evaluated.
Using 20 breast tumor samples and adjusted analytical methods, we observed high overall concordance between the three platforms evaluated, despite substantial differences in the platform composition.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com