Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(5)
No main outcome differences were observed between the two evaluated levels of TTM: 33 °C (corresponding previously to therapeutic hypothermia: TH) versus 36 °C both applied during 28 h.
The difference in overall sensitivity between the two evaluated detectors was large, 1200 cps/MBq for detector A compared with 500 cps/MBq for detector B. With the two measurable photon energies from 177Lu (113 and 208 keV) in mind, the difference in energy window settings of the two detectors are likely to have substantially contributed to the difference in sensitivity.
Our study, which included a larger group of 80 patients with 92 scans, did not confirm a clear advantage of using a z > 1.5 threshold since there was no difference in correct localization between the two evaluated values (72 vs. 70%).
Another protein that showed contrasting abundance between the two evaluated varieties was peroxidase, which, together with other enzymes, participates in the removal of H2O2 from cells.
This trend did not change between the two evaluated plants: FA release was higher from the pith (46.8% and 48.6% of FA esters) than from the interface (34.3% and 34.0% of FA esters with AnFaeA and TsFaeC, respectively) of H58 with reduced lignin content after a 72-h hydrolysis with C-X-FAE mixtures (Table 2).
Similar(55)
Due to this, the >90% homology between the two evaluating methods can be considered most satisfactory.
Between the four evaluated groups no significant differences were found in the quantity of SP-B and SP-C (Fig. 4).
We also observed that there were no differences between the two devices evaluated.
One explanation is differences between the two populations evaluated.
We use the difference between the two to evaluate the reliability of different strategies for adjusting for lead time in estimation of overdiagnosis.
Results were fitted to quadratic models describing the inherent relationships between the four factors evaluated and nasal spray performance.
More suggestions(15)
between the two calculated
between the two estimated
between the two validated
between the two assessment
between the two assessments
between the two affected
between the two sampled
between the two examined
between the two evaluators
between the two compared
between the two measured
between the two have
between the two selected
between the two treated
between the two studied
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com