Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(13)
Differences between the two analytical methods were observed, ranging between -1 and +7%, with a mean abso-lute error of 3.7%.
The relative quantities of these compounds showed good agreement between the two analytical methods.
The difference between the two analytical methods was constant (∼1.5 %) and thus values were adjusted accordingly.
Thus one would be unable to see the magnitude of the differences, if any, between the two analytical approaches.
We also investigated the differences between the two analytical methods for the measurements of CRP and SAA.
We then tested the degree of agreement between the two analytical methods using the Bland-Altman plot of difference versus mean [ 21].
Similar(47)
Both methods have been used in estimating non-linear relations between temperature and mortality, but the two analytical approaches have not been compared in distributed lag non-linear models.
Coincidentally, the amplitude changes are in agreement between the three analytical techniques.
Figures 1, 2, and 3 provide a spectral comparison between the three analytical methods.
In an attempt to evaluate the equivalency of the two analytical platforms, we calculated correlations between NMR and GC-MS concentrations for individual metabolites (supplementary information, Figure S2).
227 genes were in common for the three analytical methods.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com