Sentence examples for between the two allocation from inspiring English sources

All demographic and baseline variables were similar between the two allocation groups using bivariate analysis, except for mean airway pressure (MAP) at 24 hours, which was significantly higher in the L-carnitine group than in the placebo group (Table 1).

The main difference between the two allocation schemes is the amount of feedback required to perform power allocation.

Although crossovers between the two allocation groups could complicate data interpretation, it is impossible to prevent them.

Therefore, while the absolute results are quite different between the two allocation methods, the ranking of the options remains roughly the same across the impacts.

At 12 months there were no significant differences between the two allocation groups in changes from baseline in the primary and secondary outcomes.

However, when we examined five published reviews that had conducted sensitivity analyses on pooled mortality data from RCTs, four of these found that larger effect sizes were associated with high-quality studies, not lower quality trials as has been convention, and the absence or presence of statistical differences between the two allocation groups remained constant.

Figure 13 Performance comparison between the two power allocation schemes without source-destination path.

The objective function shows the trade-off between the two task allocation objectives with weights w 1 and w 2. The first part corresponds to minimizing the scheduling length by minimizing the maximum of the finish times of all the tasks.

This may be because when L is small, the UPA scheme lowers the effectiveness of the diversity due to the source-destination path while it enforces the effectiveness of relays for large L such as 56 and 14. Figure 14 Performance comparison between the two power allocation schemes with source-destination path.

Finally, the only difference between our two allocation groups is whether a meniscus resection was carried out or not.

An ANOVA showed significant differences in the mean for AGB between the five land allocation zones (F (4,460) = 56.06, P < 0.001) (see also Figure 3d).